Covid Dystopia: The End of History?

And all the time the coronavirus has been allowed to bring wave upon wave of fear and despair to a global population who, in the space of a few months, saw liberties that for generations were taken for granted in the West, wiped off the...

1010 6
1010 6
Covid 19 Coronavirus Lockdown Scientism

It’s like we’ve reached the end of history.

Initially it was posited that the end of the Cold War marked a major turning point in, or even the conclusion of, history as the Soviet Union collapsed under the force of socialism’s inherent flaws and failures.

Free enterprise and western-style representative democracy had finally triumphed over state-controlled communism, which had stifled initiative and defied the common-sense laws of the market.

South Africans hoped that with the collapse of communism, albeit not in China where the regime merely allowed a degree of free enterprise under totalitarian one-party control, we would be spared the typical post-colonial African experiments with Marxist policies that so rapidly destroyed countries to the north of us.

But as the decades of African National Congress (ANC) rule dragged on, it became clear the SA Communist Party still held the reins within the tripartite alliance and the National Democratic Revolution remained the objective. With the ultimate aim of giving the ANC control over all levers of power. This occurred even as the state-owned enterprises the ANC had inherited steadily collapsed under a combination of unbridled corruption and gross incompetence.

But it became clear under Cyril Ramaphosa that in some instances his government would have to reach an accord with the really powerful private corporations which own and create much of the country’s wealth. His very election as ANC leader in 2017 and hence president in 2018 seemed to stem from such an assumption.

Enter the Covid-19 pandemic early last year and history truly did stop. The global corporate elites and ruling political parties and bureaucracies, united under the World Economic Forum umbrella, plus United Nations agencies like the World Health Organisation (WHO), saw a golden opportunity to wrest control from the inconvenient billions of minions cluttering up their world.

But first they had to get rid of President Donald Trump, whose success in boosting the private sector and employment in the USA was undermining the centralised control to which the Washington DC establishment aspired.

Under the influence of the radical left of the Democratic Party and the Chinese Communist Party, America had already for decades seen the steady encroachment of critical race theory into academia and in Democrat-run states.

So, it was no problem for a great “conspiracy” (Life Magazine’s term) to be formed to oust Trump in the November 2020 election. Big tech social media companies de-platformed him while the mainstream media intensified its propaganda war against him.

Stealing the election was simple. All they had to do was focus on a handful of counties in six major cities in swing states and they could engineer a majority of electoral college votes.

With Trump out of the way and a lame-duck geriatric in his place it was time for The Great Reset, a New World Order, the New Normal and to Build Back Better. A Green New Deal also lies at the heart of the envisaged changes.

And all the time the coronavirus has been allowed to bring wave upon wave of fear and despair to a global population who, in the space of a few months, saw liberties that for generations were taken for granted in the West, wiped off the table.

Under perpetual emergency rule, formerly democratic countries are beginning to look increasingly like Communist China, where freedom of expression, movement and association are outlawed at the whim of a tiny elite of politicians.

The pandemic, clearly created by the leak of a pathogen manufactured in gain-of-function experiments with bat coronaviruses in a Wuhan laboratory, has provided politicians with the perfect weapon against humanity. The link between National Institutes of Health mini-dictator Dr Anthony Fauci and those lethal bioweapon experiments has now been pretty well conclusively established following the release of his redacted emails under Access to Information laws.

An individual’s personal health is considered his or her most important asset. So people will do almost anything to keep themselves safe from a “deadly virus”, even if the actual death rate has never been shown to be much worse than the annual flu.

But it is a nasty manufactured coronavirus and it can cause severe illness, particularly among the immune-compromised and those with existing comorbidities.

“Right,” said Bill Gates and the vaccine manufacturers he is heavily invested in and who had been discussing “the next pandemic” for years. “Let’s find a suitably vague test for infection and use soaring false positives to ramp up the fear side of the equation.”

The PCR test, developed before the pandemic, was the perfect vehicle. Find a minute trace of virus and amplify it manifold times and, eureka, you have millions of positive “cases” and ergo a pandemic. Except some 90% of the tests were false positives. Yet they’re still using PCR tests today to drive the pandemic.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has also recently admitted that only 6% of deaths attributed to Covid-19 were solely due to the virus. The rest had one or several comorbidities.

But the real master stroke has been the “warp-speed” vaccines that even Trump boasted about. Using genetic engineering, the most notorious of these involves injecting mRNA fragments into your arm to generate the spike protein of the coronavirus and induce an immune reaction. The substance was meant to stay in the injection site where the immune system would learn how to fight Covid. But instead the toxic proteins spread throughout the body, as Canadian cancer researcher Dr Byram Bridle explains.

It is “very safe”, said government health authorities and the WHO, even as the spike proteins caused thousands of deaths and potentially millions of adverse events. Myocarditis (heart inflammation), blood clots, microclotting in the capillaries and uterus injuries, among others, have been reported.

Children’s Health Defense, quoted on The Burning Platform website, says:

“Now, in less than a year, more than half a million reports of injuries have flooded into VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System] following experimental COVID jabs, including thousands of deaths. Yet a deafening regulatory silence has greeted this record-setting volume of adverse reactions, which accounts for nearly a third of all reports accumulated by VAERS over its entire three-decade lifespan.”

Also from The Burning Platform comes the following:

“Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date.

Data released today show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and June 25, 2021, a total of 411,931 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 6,985 deaths — an increase of 872 deaths over the previous week. There were 34,065 serious injury reports, up 2,825 compared with last week.”

The Rights and Freedoms website gives a comprehensive breakdown of the causes of deaths and injuries reported to VAERS as of 25 June 2021. In an introduction it states:

“Of the 6,985 deaths reported as of June 25, 22% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 15% occurred within 24 hours and 38% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.”

All the types of injury listed above, and more, are to be found on the VAERS site as outlined here.

But it’s all worth it, people say, because we just want to be protected. Except, despite the increasingly high risks, the injections don’t even offer full protection. The vaccinated still have to wear masks, physically distance and can get infected, while their immune systems may be forever compromised.

And, of course, costly booster jabs will be required ad infinitum, it seems, as a never-ending supply of variants is used to drive the fear agenda.

Wave upon wave of “infections” can be announced and no one is able to question or verify the figures. Access to hospitals to see ailing loved ones is often denied and doctors are fearful of having their licences revoked if they rock the boat.

Never before has a disease been so badly handled. Instead of focusing on treatment, it was discouraged, and doctors were advised by the WHO and national health authorities to advise patients to isolate at home and come to hospital if their symptoms got severe. By then it was often too late and many died agonising deaths on ventilators, with no effective treatment provided.

The Great Barrington Declaration was signed in the USA by infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists on 4 October last year, condemning the way governments and the WHO had handled the pandemic. Instead of quarantining the most vulnerable, they had targeted the healthy and are still doing so. Part of the declaration, signed in Massachusetts, reads:

“The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.”

In about mid-2020 word got out that the Nobel-prize-winning anti-parasitic drug ivermectin is effective as an antiviral and anti-inflammatory against all phases and, it emerged, future variants of Covid-19. This safe cheap generic drug, 3.5 billion doses of which had been given to people in recent decades to treat river blindness and elephantiasis, could, in conjunction with other off-label medicines, halt the coronavirus in its tracks and end the pandemic. Its safety and efficacy had led to its inventors receiving the 2015 Nobel prize for medicine.

“This cannot be!” the WHO, government health authorities and politicians no doubt said in unison. And so, in lockstep with the agenda of the global corporate and political elite, mainstream media and big tech social media closed down all reference to ivermectin. The WHO advised against its use. It was regularly ridiculed on social and mainstream media as a veterinary drug that would “give you a glossy coat”.

In South Africa, most people only know it as a veterinary drug, yet it is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines for human beings. But the generic is not being manufactured in South Africa, except on a small scale by “compounding chemists”, and this only after doctors early this year took the SA Health Products Regulatory Authority to court to force their hand. As it is not on the National Pharmaceutical Products Index it is not available on medical aid. Most people think it is a liquid, whereas the human formulation is a tablet.

The suppression of ivermectin and other medicines for the treatment of Covid got so bad that a court order had to be obtained by a family in the USA to force a hospital to allow ivermectin to be used after its 20 doctors (no doubt, acting under FDA and CDC standard-of-care, or lack thereof, rules) refused to administer it to a critically ill Covid patient. The woman pulled through when the court allowed an outside doctor to step in and treat her with ivermectin, as is recorded here.

All the time, the Covid narrative has been strictly controlled through biased reporting in the mainstream media and rigid censorship of social media. I personally am under a second virtually consecutive 30-day Facebook ban for disseminating information about the efficacy of ivermectin.

As a retired journalist, I have been following this story since Covid’s arrival, and much of the information about the real situation has been acquired not through Google, but despite it. I have been sent links to relevant seminars and interviews, or reports in alternative media, as the big four of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram have used algorithms to bury any “inconvenient” views and information landing up on the internet.

Fortunately, by the time I came to write this article I had discovered search engine DuckDuckGo, which circumvents the Google algorithms and takes you to what you are actually searching for, not some sanitised version of the truth.

This censorship has attempted to silence numerous caring, concerned physicians and scientists who saw through the authorities’ agenda from the outset. They could not understand why no attempt was being made to actually save the lives of patients as hysteria trumped science.

An address by Dr Pierre Kory of the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance to the US Senate late last year advocating the use of ivermectin received almost 10 million views on YouTube, only to be summarily removed.

The same action has been taken against numerous prominent physicians and scientists who have attempted to alert the world to what the elite are really up to.

Even people reporting adverse reactions to the vaccines are removed from social media platforms.

Imagine being a fly on the wall at the G7 meeting in the UK a few months ago. What did these self-righteous control freaks talk about in their private, mask-free chats? Even in their official discussions?

Surely the bottom line was that this, now, is a golden opportunity for these leaders and those in control of the big multinationals to secure their privileged positions for the foreseeable future at the expense of the plebs.

All the pieces are in place for WEF boss Klaus Shwab’s Great Reset that will comprise an ongoing process of mutual support between big business, global organisations, “philanthropic capitalist” foundations and national governments.

Let’s call it crony capitalism, or perhaps corporate socialism with a racial slant.
Because ultimately the aim is also to shame Caucasian males in particular into silence and subservience through critical race theory. This will remove the elites’ most dangerous opponents: independent-minded white males.

There has been a consistent attempt in recent decades to dismiss the achievements of western democracy and even of science, both of which were largely the product of Caucasian men in Europe and North America over the past half a millennium. These advances are the product of our cultural evolution and have given us modern civilisation.

Totalitarian states rely on the erasing of history in order to create the impression that the new order they are imposing was their own creation and everything that preceded it was an aberration. All past achievements are downplayed or erased, which is why one saw at UCT in 2015 students calling for the “decolonisation of science”, a totally ludicrous concept that was and still is taken terribly seriously.

One of the greatest scientists of all time, Isaac Newton, was targeted as an example of the sort of privileged, arrogant white male whose contributions to science were ripe to be ridiculed by totally ignorant students. The likes of these indoctrinated woke people have been moving into leadership positions around the world for decades.

In the forum at UCT, the leftist students doubled down on an absurd statement about harnessing lightning to strike your enemies by lambasting a white male and ordering him to apologise after, despite general laughter among other students who knew it was nonsense, he said “it isn’t true”. He received a lengthy lecture from the chairwoman that would not have been out of place in Communist China.

So yes, I believe the new politically correct laws for the New World Order will, in one way or another, target white males who are the product of their forebears’ achievements – except of course for the select few Caucasians like Schwab, Gates, Prince Charles, Soros, Zuckerberg and Fauci, who are the political and corporate elite actually running the show.

I haven’t read George Orwell’s “1984” for years but I can still feel the mood, the atmosphere, which pervades that 1948 novel. It is utterly dystopian, and I fear that is where we are headed. Australia is currently looking terribly Orwellian as bullying politicians seek to subjugate an entire nation.

Climate alarmism will soon re-emerge forcefully as a double whammy against the individual by the global state.

As with Covid and Biden’s rigged election, the mainstream media can be relied upon to toe the line of the ruling elite. This conspiracy goes under the title of the Trusted News Initiative and it too could be straight out of Orwell.

The TNI brings together powerful and influential news agencies AP and AFP; the BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, Microsoft, news agency Reuters, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, and The Washington Post.

First Draft itself comprises nine news organisations and receives funding from Bernard and Anne Spitzer Charitable Trust, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, Democracy Fund, Facebook Journalism Project, Ford Foundation, Google News Initiative, John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, The Klarman Family Foundation, Media Democracy Fund, The Newton and Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust, Rita Allen Foundation, Swiss Democracy Fund, Open Society Foundations, Wellcome Trust.

In this article, BBC director-general Tim Davie says: “2020 has been a year like no other. We have seen the rapid spread of harmful disinformation and a growing number of conspiracy theories online. Whether it’s a threat to our health or a threat to our democracy, there is a human cost to disinformation.

“The Trusted News Initiative partners will continue to work together to expand our framework and ensure legitimate concerns about future vaccinations are heard, whilst harmful disinformation myths are stopped in their tracks.”

So the “official news” we receive is all filtered through a network of companies and trusts, including Big Pharma. And most people simply follow orders like school children.

It’s all for our own good this loss of income, of freedom to travel, of freedom to breathe without a mask, of freedom to associate, of freedom to expect answers to probing questions, they say to themselves.

It’s all for our own good that fossil fuels will be banned or made prohibitively expensive.

Progress was all right once, we are told, but now we must acknowledge it was all done wrong. The planet’s on fire, or in imminent threat of being inundated as the ice caps melt, or both, we have been told ad nauseum for the past 30 or more years.

Funnily enough, though, the predicted climate catastrophe keeps not coming even close to happening – unless you watch the BBC or CNN.

What we are meant to take from this is that we no longer need history because, echoing Orwell, what came before is tainted with white privilege, colonialism and slavery. It’s an aberration and must be erased, like the name and origins of 1820 British settler city Port Elizabeth.

Far better that we all embrace a history-free future and accept any and all changes our good, fair leaders decide to make.

After all, they’re there to keep us safe and only have our very best interests at heart.

In this article

Leave a Reply


  1. Rory Short Reply

    I find the point of this article difficult to pin down. Is it that the world is being taken by members of the New World Order? It does not seem so to me but then perhaps I’ve been duped.

    1. Nicholas Woode-Smith Reply

      The point I decided to take from it is more that the pandemic itself is being used by different organisations, governments and actors to manipulate and oppress many people.

      I think it’d be silly to believe all governments and companies are in cahoots, but they can definitely all exploit the same thing for their similar ends.

  2. Josephine Russell Reply

    We need figures for the ivermection. Who and how many treated and the outcomes survival or death?
    Why has Dr Hill changed his tune about ivermection? Who changed his conclusion when the data showed
    a 87% .recovery.
    Do we have data from Zimbabwe who used Ivermection on big scale?
    We need to stop running in circles and get the data and proof then flood the media with it.

    1. Kin Bentley Reply

      Josephine the FLCCC has done extensive research into the use of Ivermectin in the treatment of Covid.
      They have monitored its efficacy around the world, including in certain densely populated states in India.
      In states like Uttar Pradesh where ivermectin was given to the general population the disease was dramatically reduced during the recent wave, compared to states that did not receive it.
      Dr Kory of the FLCCC can cite numerous examples of similar successes in other countries, including Zimbabwe.
      But his message continues to be suppressed.
      Dr Hill’s findings were subverted by the WHO after his research found strongly in favour of Ivermectin.
      Here is a link to the FLCCC website. Also click on the menu (three horizontal red lines) to find a wealth of information about the treatment of Covid, including their latest protocols.

  3. Roger Smith Reply

    Fantastic article Kin. We can only hope that the masses will awake from their slumber, and see this ongoing program for the destruction of the good that went before for what it is.

  4. Ivermectin: It’s All About Treatment, Or The Lack Thereof Reply

    […] The propagandists keep claiming that ivermectin is only a horse dewormer and cannot possibly be useful in combating Covid. […]

Rational Standard
%d bloggers like this: